2:14
Megan deBettencourt - Applied Mathematics
Megan deBettencourt started participating in faculty research projects at Columbia since h...
published: 20 Oct 2010
author: ColumbiaSEAS
Megan deBettencourt - Applied Mathematics
Megan deBettencourt - Applied Mathematics
Megan deBettencourt started participating in faculty research projects at Columbia since her second year at SEAS. Her senior year, she worked on neuroscience...- published: 20 Oct 2010
- views: 2579
- author: ColumbiaSEAS
2:28
Investigating Intelligence - A conversation with John Duncan (Preview)
[You can watch the full conversation on our website (www.ideasroadshow.com) or iPad app on...
published: 15 Aug 2013
Investigating Intelligence - A conversation with John Duncan (Preview)
Investigating Intelligence - A conversation with John Duncan (Preview)
[You can watch the full conversation on our website (www.ideasroadshow.com) or iPad app on Apple Newsstand] What is intelligence? Surely it's not just one thing: one can have a high IQ but that doesn't mean they're street smart nor does that include being emotionally intelligent. And what about wit? John Duncan, Professor of Cognitive Neuroscience at Cambridge University, is convinced these are all related and measurable by the General or G factor. Howard sat down with John in Cambridge to talk about the nature of G as explained through Duncan's book How Intelligence Happens, G's history and the tests involved in it's proof, as well as the behaviour of neurons, brain imaging technology and the future of the lucrative field of neuroscience.- published: 15 Aug 2013
- views: 6
16:32
In Motion Broadcast IV - Artificial Intelligence [Part 1]
This video is part 1 of 2 In Motion Broadcast IV - Artificial Intelligence Part 2 -http://...
published: 21 Feb 2013
author: Tom Hickson
In Motion Broadcast IV - Artificial Intelligence [Part 1]
In Motion Broadcast IV - Artificial Intelligence [Part 1]
This video is part 1 of 2 In Motion Broadcast IV - Artificial Intelligence Part 2 -http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZGnxi9jOFk How does an animal/machine beco...- published: 21 Feb 2013
- views: 1450
- author: Tom Hickson
73:01
Jeff Hawkins: Advances in Modeling Neocortex and its Impact on Machine Intelligence
Smith Group Lecture by Jeff Hawkins presented at the Beckman Institute for Advanced Scienc...
published: 18 Oct 2011
author: BeckmanInstitute
Jeff Hawkins: Advances in Modeling Neocortex and its Impact on Machine Intelligence
Jeff Hawkins: Advances in Modeling Neocortex and its Impact on Machine Intelligence
Smith Group Lecture by Jeff Hawkins presented at the Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign ...- published: 18 Oct 2011
- views: 7909
- author: BeckmanInstitute
22:36
In Motion Broadcast IV - Artificial Intelligence Part [2]
This video is part 2 of 2 In Motion Broadcast IV - Artificial Intelligence Part 1 - http:/...
published: 21 Feb 2013
author: Tom Hickson
In Motion Broadcast IV - Artificial Intelligence Part [2]
In Motion Broadcast IV - Artificial Intelligence Part [2]
This video is part 2 of 2 In Motion Broadcast IV - Artificial Intelligence Part 1 - http://youtu.be/vTrMs8dtWAY How does an animal/machine become intelligent...- published: 21 Feb 2013
- views: 414
- author: Tom Hickson
0:00
RI Seminar: Stefan Schaal : From Movement Primitives to Associative Skill Memories
Stefan Schaal
Professor of Computer Science, Neuroscience, and Biomedical Engineering, Uni...
published: 24 Mar 2014
RI Seminar: Stefan Schaal : From Movement Primitives to Associative Skill Memories
RI Seminar: Stefan Schaal : From Movement Primitives to Associative Skill Memories
Stefan Schaal Professor of Computer Science, Neuroscience, and Biomedical Engineering, University of Southern California March 28, 2014 Abstract Controlling a complex movement system requires making perceptual and control decisions at every moment of time, and learning and adaptation to improve the system's performance. High dimensional continuous state-action spaces still pose significant scaling problems for learning algorithms to find (approximately) optimal solutions, and appropriate task descriptions or cost functions require a large amount of human guidance. In order to address autonomous skillful movement generation in complex robot and task scenarios, we have been working on a variety of subproblems to facilitate robust task achievement. Among these topics are general representations for movement in form of movement primitives, trajectory-based reinforcement learning with path integral reinforcement learning, and inverse reinforcement learning to extract the "intent" of observed behavior. However, this "action centric" view of skill acquisition needs to be extended with a stronger perceptual component, as, in the end, it is the entire perception-action-learning loop that could be considered the key element to address, rather than isolated components of this loop. In some tentative initial research, we have been exploring Associative Skill Memories, i.e., the simple idea to start memorizing all sensory events and their statistics together with each movement skill. This concepts opens a wide spectrum of adding predictive, corrective, and switching behaviors in motor skills, and may create an interesting foundation to automatically generate the graphs underlying complex sequential motor skills. Our research results will be illustrated in various experiments with complex anthropomorphic robot systems. Speaker Biography Stefan Schaal is Professor of Computer Science, Neuroscience, and Biomedical Engineering at the University of Southern California, and a Founding Director of the Max-Planck-Insitute for Intelligent Systems in Tuebingen, Germany. He is also an Invited Researcher at the ATR Computational Neuroscience Laboratory in Japan, where he held an appointment as Head of the Computational Learning Group during an international ERATO project, the Kawato Dynamic Brain Project (ERATO/JST). Dr. Schaal's research interests include topics of statistical and machine learning, neural networks, computational neuroscience, functional brain imaging, nonlinear dynamics, nonlinear control theory, and biomimetic robotics. He applies his research to problems of artificial and biological motor control and motor learning, focusing on both theoretical investigations and experiments with human subjects and anthropomorphic robot equipment.- published: 24 Mar 2014
- views: 1
65:46
Amit Ashok 2013
September 30 2013 COSI Seminar by Amit Ashok Assistant Professor, College of Optical Scien...
published: 02 Oct 2013
Amit Ashok 2013
Amit Ashok 2013
September 30 2013 COSI Seminar by Amit Ashok Assistant Professor, College of Optical Sciences, ECE Department, University of Arizona. "A Task Specific Approach to Computational Imaging" ABSTRACT: Optical imaging systems have evolved with the goal of producing an isomorphic measurement of a scene. Typically such imaging systems place the sole burden of image formation on optics while the role of detector array is relegated to sampling/digitization of the optical image. Post-processing is usually viewed as a "tool" to mitigate image artifacts/noise, apply compression, and/or enable exploitation tasks such as pattern recognition, target tracking etc. The traditional design approach optimizes each sub-system (optics, detector, post-processing) separately and often results in sub-optimal designs. In contrast, computational optical imaging exploits the optical, detector, and post-processing design degrees of freedom jointly to achieve end-to-end system optimality. Such a joint design approach is especially suited to task-specific imaging as it allows one to incorporate knowledge of scene statistics and specific task in the system design. In this talk, I will discuss examples of computational imaging system design for specific tasks, such as image formation and pattern recognition, to highlight the power of the joint-design framework. A task-specific information-theoretic approach to imaging system design and analysis will be also discussed in the context of the fundamental limits of imaging systems. SHORT BIO: Amit Ashok is an Assistant Professor in the College of Optical Sciences and the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Arizona. He directs the Intelligent Imaging and Sensing Lab which focuses in the area of computational imaging, statistical inference, and intelligent system design. Before joining Optical Sciences, he was a research faculty in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Arizona from 2009 to 2011 where he carried out research in the areas of computational imaging and statistical inference. Prior to that he was a senior research scientist in the research and development division of Omnivision CDM Optics from 2007 to 2009 and worked on novel computational imaging system designs for commercial applications ranging from security to mobile phone cameras. He received his PhD degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the University of Arizona in 2008 and his M.Sc. degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of Cape Town, South Africa in 2001. His research interests include computational imaging and sensing, physical optics, statistical inference, and information theory.- published: 02 Oct 2013
- views: 3
1:14
Brain Function Not Completely Dependent on Size
In order to determine the intelligence of a species, scientists often use the brain mass r...
published: 30 Dec 2013
Brain Function Not Completely Dependent on Size
Brain Function Not Completely Dependent on Size
In order to determine the intelligence of a species, scientists often use the brain mass relative to the body size of an animal. But it turns out that although relative brain size does play a role in the level of intelligence, there are other factors that might also be important to the development of an intelligent brain. Neuroscientists from Harvard University have offered up an explanation for how complex brains capable of high levels of intelligence evolved in modern humans. By mapping the connections in the human brain using functional magnetic resonance imaging, the researchers were able to compare the brain structures of several species. Mammalian animal brains are separated into areas called cortices that control different sensory inputs like vision, along with motor cortices for behavior. These cortices are connected by neurons in a straightforward fashion. Human brains however, also have well developed association cortices wired in a complex and random pattern. The researchers found that there are more of these connections in the human brain which reportedly control our decision making, memory recall and introspection. There is no definitive test for animal intelligence, but because of our faculties and cognitive capabilities, and advanced use of tools and language, humans are believed to be the most intelligent species on the planet.- published: 30 Dec 2013
- views: 100
18:22
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Teaching Computers to Read Biology
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Teaching Computers to Read Biology
Video Courtesy of ...
published: 26 Sep 2013
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Teaching Computers to Read Biology
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Teaching Computers to Read Biology
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Teaching Computers to Read Biology Video Courtesy of Bar-Ilan University & The Chaim Sheba Medical Center http://www.youtube.com/user/SNMDM Bar-Ilan University & The Chaim Sheba Medical Center - The Biomedical Informatics Program - and The Science Network of Medical Data Mining Course 80-665 - Medical Data Mining Spring, 2012 Lecturer: Dr. Ronen Tal-Botzer Lecture 07: Artificial Intelligence in Medicine - Part C: Teaching Computers to Read Biology Topic 34: Computational Linguistics Recording Date: May 14th., 2012 Filmed by Adi Zarchiany Produced by The Digital Photography Unit - Tamar Anker The Mina and Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences and The Science Network of Medical Data Mining License: http://www.youtube.com/yt/copyright/creative-commons.html Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rMs8AIWgcWY Retrieved: 9/25/2013- published: 26 Sep 2013
- views: 0
5:50
Dialogue in Neuroscience: Challenges and Strategies
Walter Glannon, bioethicist at the University of Calgary, Canada, tells us about hot issue...
published: 27 Jul 2011
author: neuromediacorner
Dialogue in Neuroscience: Challenges and Strategies
Dialogue in Neuroscience: Challenges and Strategies
Walter Glannon, bioethicist at the University of Calgary, Canada, tells us about hot issues and future strategies in neuroscience. Interview at 'dialogue to ...- published: 27 Jul 2011
- views: 212
- author: neuromediacorner
0:09
Image Processing using artificial intelligence, supervised classification, RGB segmentation_Result 1
Srikar Garrepally
sgarrep@gmail.com...
published: 22 Sep 2013
Image Processing using artificial intelligence, supervised classification, RGB segmentation_Result 1
Image Processing using artificial intelligence, supervised classification, RGB segmentation_Result 1
Srikar Garrepally sgarrep@gmail.com- published: 22 Sep 2013
- views: 21
1:40
IERecS - Intelligent Emotion Recognition System
An Intelligent Emotion Recognition System that identifies emotions using Brain Waves (EEG)...
published: 06 Apr 2012
author: upani wijeratne
IERecS - Intelligent Emotion Recognition System
IERecS - Intelligent Emotion Recognition System
An Intelligent Emotion Recognition System that identifies emotions using Brain Waves (EEG) and Facial Expressions and then provides music therapy based on th...- published: 06 Apr 2012
- views: 642
- author: upani wijeratne
80:42
17th Kenneth B Myer Lecture - Dr. Karl Deisseroth - Clarity of Mind - October 2013
Clarity of Mind: Optical Deconstruction of Fully-Assembled Biological Systems
Dr. Deisse...
published: 08 Nov 2013
17th Kenneth B Myer Lecture - Dr. Karl Deisseroth - Clarity of Mind - October 2013
17th Kenneth B Myer Lecture - Dr. Karl Deisseroth - Clarity of Mind - October 2013
Clarity of Mind: Optical Deconstruction of Fully-Assembled Biological Systems Dr. Deisseroth is an associate professor of bioengineering and psychiatry at Stanford University. As a psychiatrist, Stanford University's Karl Deisseroth treats patients with depression, schizophrenia, and other serious mental health disorders. But early in his career he bumped up against the limitations of the field. Brain disorders are chronic, hard to treat, and sometimes fatal. Drugs often don't help. "We just don't understand them," Deisseroth says of mental illness and other brain disorders like Parkinson's disease. He has developed and applied novel technologies for controlling (optogenetics) and imaging (CLARITY) specific elements within intact biological systems, and continues to develop and apply new technologies to study physiology and behavior in health and disease, as well as train researchers around the world. He has received the NIH Pioneer Award (2005), Scheutze Prize (2008), Society for Neuroscience Young Investigator Award (2009), Koetser Prize (2010), Nakasone Prize (2010), Spencer Prize (2011), UNC/Perl Prize (2012), Zuelch Prize (2012), Pasarow Prize (2013), BRAIN prize (2013) and Lounsbery Prize (2013). Deisseroth is a member of the Institute of Medicine and the National Academy of Sciences.- published: 08 Nov 2013
- views: 158
Vimeo results:
2:24
ARS ELECTRONICA - NEUE BILDER VOM MENSCHEN
This age we live in is one dominated more than ever by science and technology. The new ima...
published: 22 Feb 2010
author: Ars Electronica
ARS ELECTRONICA - NEUE BILDER VOM MENSCHEN
This age we live in is one dominated more than ever by science and technology. The new imaging methods used in the neurosciences observe our brain as it thinks. They show us how perception, emotions and intelligence function, and attempt to explain how our consciousness originates. Molecular biologists and genetic engineers are decoding the elementary building blocks of life. They’re manipulating life, and creating artificial life forms.
New cultural techniques are emerging in the ever more tightly-knit global networks of digital technologies. Engineers are constructing machines that imitate human capabilities. And with the launch of the space telescope, we’re peering far beyond our own solar system into the depths of space and time. The findings and insights coming to light thereby are beginning to permanently change our picture of the world and of the people who inhabit it.
“New Views of Humankind” deals with these changes. It shows where these images come from, how they materialize, and how we interpret them. In going about this, art and science are deployed in tandem as two methods that often seem dissimilar to us but are related in many ways. After all, the aim of both has always been to understand and explain the world.
Four labs constitute the exhibition’s core: BrainLab, BioLab, RoboLab and FabLab. Via interaction and hands-on experience, visitors get an introduction to the mental and visual worlds of the modern Life Sciences.
Read more:
http://www.aec.at/center_exhibitions_ds_en.php?id=97
45:38
The Mind Is Not The Brain - Scientific Evidence - Rupert Sheldrake - (Referenced Notes)
Rupert Sheldrake's homepage
http://www.sheldrake.org/homepage.html
,,,Rupert Sheldrake t...
published: 11 Dec 2011
author: Philip Cunningham
The Mind Is Not The Brain - Scientific Evidence - Rupert Sheldrake - (Referenced Notes)
Rupert Sheldrake's homepage
http://www.sheldrake.org/homepage.html
,,,Rupert Sheldrake talks of a internet site he has set up especially for skeptics so they could do the experiments online for themselves:
Here is the online test site:
Online Tests
Rupert Sheldrake invites you to participate in his ongoing research. No previous experience is necessary, and the online tests can be done immediately. Most of these experiments are suitable for use in schools and colleges, and some make an excellent basis for student projects.
http://www.sheldrake.org/Onlineexp/portal/index.html
Here is an interesting video which was loaded recently:
Rupert Sheldrake Lecture: The Science Delusion - video
description: Temenos Academy 6th February 2012 at the Lincoln Centre Dispelling the Ten Dogmas of Materialism and Freeing the Spirit of Enquiry
http://vimeo.com/37792854
Entire video:
The Extended Mind: Recent Experimental Evidence- Sheldrake
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JnA8GUtXpXY
Further Notes:
Quantum mind–body problem
Excerpt:Parallels between quantum mechanics and mind/body dualism were first drawn by the founders of quantum mechanics including Erwin Schrödinger, Werner Heisenberg, Wolfgang Pauli, Niels Bohr, and Eugene Wigner
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_mind%E2%80%93body_problem
Dr. Quantum - Double Slit Experiment & Entanglement - video
http://www.metacafe.com/watch/4096579
The Mental Universe - Richard Conn Henry - Professor of Physics John Hopkins University
Excerpt: The only reality is mind and observations, but observations are not of things. To see the Universe as it really is, we must abandon our tendency to conceptualize observations as things.,,, Physicists shy away from the truth because the truth is so alien to everyday physics. A common way to evade the mental universe is to invoke "decoherence" - the notion that "the physical environment" is sufficient to create reality, independent of the human mind. Yet the idea that any irreversible act of amplification is necessary to collapse the wave function is known to be wrong: in "Renninger-type" experiments, the wave function is collapsed simply by your human mind seeing nothing. The universe is entirely mental,,,, The Universe is immaterial — mental and spiritual. Live, and enjoy.
http://henry.pha.jhu.edu/The.mental.universe.pdf
Wheeler's Classic Delayed Choice Experiment:
Excerpt: Now, for many billions of years the photon is in transit in region 3. Yet we can choose (many billions of years later) which experimental set up to employ – the single wide-focus, or the two narrowly focused instruments. We have chosen whether to know which side of the galaxy the photon passed by (by choosing whether to use the two-telescope set up or not, which are the instruments that would give us the information about which side of the galaxy the photon passed). We have delayed this choice until a time long after the particles "have passed by one side of the galaxy, or the other side of the galaxy, or both sides of the galaxy," so to speak. Yet, it seems paradoxically that our later choice of whether to obtain this information determines which side of the galaxy the light passed, so to speak, billions of years ago. So it seems that time has nothing to do with effects of quantum mechanics. And, indeed, the original thought experiment was not based on any analysis of how particles evolve and behave over time – it was based on the mathematics. This is what the mathematics predicted for a result, and this is exactly the result obtained in the laboratory.
http://www.bottomlayer.com/bottom/basic_delayed_choice.htm
Moreover, the 'pre-collapsed' quantum wave of the photon is mathematically defined as infinite information, before it collapses to its 'uncertain' particle state:
Wave function
Excerpt "wave functions form an abstract vector space",,, This vector space is infinite-dimensional, because there is no finite set of functions which can be added together in various combinations to create every possible function.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave_function#Wave_functions_as_an_abstract_vector_space
Quantum Computing – Stanford Encyclopedia
Excerpt: Theoretically, a single qubit can store an infinite amount of information, yet when measured (and thus collapsing the Quantum Wave state) it yields only the classical result (0 or 1),,,
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qt-quantcomp/#2.1
Single photons to soak up data:
Excerpt: the orbital angular momentum of a photon can take on an infinite number of values. Since a photon can also exist in a superposition of these states, it could – in principle – be encoded with an infinite amount of information.
http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/7201
This following experiment extended Wheeler's delayed choice double slit experiment, which I referenced earlier, to highlight the centrality of 'information' in the Double Slit Experiment and refutes any 'detector centered' arguments for why the wave collapses
141:40
Fractal Minds & the Sacred Cosmology
In this presentation Wai H. Tsang examines what it is that we’re actually doing in our liv...
published: 20 Jan 2013
author: Paradigm Shift Productions Ltd
Fractal Minds & the Sacred Cosmology
In this presentation Wai H. Tsang examines what it is that we’re actually doing in our lives and explains what is the underlying process behind all our behaviour. This talk will build on and complement the previous talk ‘2012 and the Fractal Brain Theory’(See video link below), but will also be standalone; essential points from the previous presentation will be recapped. Whereas the last talk dealt more with the neural structures of the brain, this talk will deal more with process and purpose. Also whereas the last talk was more
about the substrates of mind, this one will cover the psychological, introspective, cognitive and behavioural aspects.
Later in the presentation Wai will do something very ambitious and show a complete correspondence between the process of our lives and the overall process of the entire Universe, thereby confirming in the latest 21st century scientific concepts the timeless idea that, ‘As is the Microcosm so is the Macrocosm’ and the notion that somehow we all made in the Image of God, enacting in our lives the divine process. Interestingly he will explore, using the Fractal Brain Theory, how it is and why it is that people experience certain special subjective states of being ‘one with the Universe’, ‘one with God’, ‘infinite consciousness’, etc. Thereby reaffirming ancient methods and techniques.
This talk will be highly relevant to anyone interested in Psychology, Neuroscience, Self Development, Artificial Intelligence, Philosophy, Law of Attraction, Prophecy; also Cosmology and Esoteric Religion i.e. Tantra, Mystical Yoga, Kabbalah, Sufism, Gnosticism, Vajrayana Buddhism and Taoism.
24:40
Quantum Mechanics and Consciousness - A New Measurement - Bernard Haisch, Ph.D
Entire video may be viewed here:
Quantum Mechanics and Consciousness: A New Measurement
h...
published: 27 Feb 2012
author: Philip Cunningham
Quantum Mechanics and Consciousness - A New Measurement - Bernard Haisch, Ph.D
Entire video may be viewed here:
Quantum Mechanics and Consciousness: A New Measurement
http://www.scientificexploration.org/talks/27th_annual/27th_annual_haisch_quantum_mechanics_consciousness.html
Here is a clip of a talk in which Alain Aspect talks about the failure of 'local realism', or the failure of materialism, to explain reality:
Quantum Entanglement – The Failure Of Local Realism - Materialism - Alain Aspect - video
http://www.metacafe.com/w/4744145
The falsification for local realism (materialism) was recently greatly strengthened:
Physicists close two loopholes while violating local realism - November 2010
Excerpt: The latest test in quantum mechanics provides even stronger support than before for the view that nature violates local realism and is thus in contradiction with a classical worldview.
http://www.physorg.com/news/2010-11-physicists-loopholes-violating-local-realism.html
This following study adds to Alain Aspect's work in Quantum Mechanics and solidly refutes the 'hidden variable' argument that has been used by materialists to try to get around the Theistic implications of the instantaneous 'spooky action at a distance' found in quantum mechanics.
Quantum Measurements: Common Sense Is Not Enough, Physicists Show - July 2009
Excerpt: scientists have now proven comprehensively in an experiment for the first time that the experimentally observed phenomena cannot be described by non-contextual models with hidden variables.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/07/090722142824.htm
(of note: hidden variables were postulated to remove the need for 'spooky' forces, as Einstein termed them — forces that act instantaneously at great distances, thereby breaking the most cherished rule of relativity theory, that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light.)
In fact the foundation of quantum mechanics within science is now so solid that researchers were able to bring forth this following proof from quantum entanglement experiments;
An experimental test of all theories with predictive power beyond quantum theory – May 2011
Excerpt: Hence, we can immediately refute any already considered or yet-to-be-proposed alternative model with more predictive power than this. (Quantum Theory)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1105.0133.pdf
Now this is completely unheard of in science as far as I know. i.e. That a mathematical description of reality would advance to the point that one can actually perform a experiment showing that your current theory will not be exceeded in predictive power by another future theory is simply unprecedented in science!
Quantum Mechanics has now been extended by Anton Zeilinger, and team, to falsify local realism (reductive materialism) without even using quantum entanglement to do it:
‘Quantum Magic’ Without Any ‘Spooky Action at a Distance’ – June 2011
Excerpt: A team of researchers led by Anton Zeilinger at the University of Vienna and the Institute for Quantum Optics and Quantum Information of the Austrian Academy of Sciences used a system which does not allow for entanglement, and still found results which cannot be interpreted classically.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/06/110624111942.htm
Falsification of Local Realism without using Quantum Entanglement - Anton Zeilinger
http://vimeo.com/34168474
One of the first, and most enigmatic, questions that arises from people after seeing the Quantum actions that are 'observed' in the infamous double slit experiment is, "What does conscious observation have to do with anything in the experiments of quantum mechanics?" and thus by extrapolation of that question, "What does conscious observation have to do with anything in the universe?" Yet, the seemingly counter-intuitive conclusion that consciousness is to be treated as a separate entity when dealing with quantum mechanics, and thus with the universe, has some very strong clout behind it.
Quantum mind–body problem
Parallels between quantum mechanics and mind/body dualism were first drawn by the founders of quantum mechanics including Erwin Schrödinger, Werner Heisenberg, Wolfgang Pauli, Niels Bohr, and Eugene Wigner
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_mind%E2%80%93body_problem
"It was not possible to formulate the laws (of quantum theory) in a fully consistent way without reference to consciousness." Eugene Wigner (1902 -1995) from his collection of essays "Symmetries and Reflections – Scientific Essays"; Eugene Wigner laid the foundation for the theory of symmetries in quantum mechanics, for which he received the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1963.
http://eugene-wigner.co.tv/
"It will remain remarkable, in whatever way our future concepts may develop, that the very study of the external world led to the scientific conclusion that the content of the consciousness is the ultimate universal reality" - Eugene Wigner - (Remarks on the Mind-Body Question, Eugene Wigner, in Wheeler and Zurek, p.169) - received Nobel Prize in 1963 for 'Quantum Sy
Youtube results:
3:00
Super-resolution system by artificial intelligence : NeuronDoubler
[Summary] I developed the super-resolution software "NeuronDoubler". It is enlarge the ima...
published: 06 Jan 2013
author: Wirewriggle
Super-resolution system by artificial intelligence : NeuronDoubler
Super-resolution system by artificial intelligence : NeuronDoubler
[Summary] I developed the super-resolution software "NeuronDoubler". It is enlarge the image file (Jpeg/Bmp/Png/Gif) using artificial intelligence (neural ne...- published: 06 Jan 2013
- views: 152
- author: Wirewriggle
25:11
TOTAL RECALL - Symposium - Alfred Anwander - EN
Mapping the network of nerves in the human brain is the subject of a speech by neuroscient...
published: 16 Sep 2013
TOTAL RECALL - Symposium - Alfred Anwander - EN
TOTAL RECALL - Symposium - Alfred Anwander - EN
Mapping the network of nerves in the human brain is the subject of a speech by neuroscientist Alfred Anwander of the Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences. He reports on diffusion tensor imaging and connectome research, methods scientists are now using to better understand human memory. Alfred Anwander (DE) is a neuroscientist and connectome researcher at the Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences in Leipzig who is making important contributions to research on anatomic linkages with an emphasis on language networks in the brain and learning to speak. http://www.aec.at/totalrecall/en/2013/07/31/total-recall-symposium-panel-1/- published: 16 Sep 2013
- views: 21
76:59
Qu'est-ce qu'un cerveau ?
À l'occasion de Cervorama, exposition interactive organisée par Cap Sciences à Bordeaux ju...
published: 24 Oct 2013
Qu'est-ce qu'un cerveau ?
Qu'est-ce qu'un cerveau ?
À l'occasion de Cervorama, exposition interactive organisée par Cap Sciences à Bordeaux jusqu'au 5 janvier 2014, Daniel Choquet, directeur de recherche au CNRS, directeur de l'Institut interdisciplinaire de neuroscience, de la plateforme Bordeaux Imaging Center, membre de l'Académie des sciences et directeur scientifique du projet LabEx BRAIN ainsi que Xavier Leinekugel, chargé de recherche à l'Inserm sur la dynamique des réseaux neuronaux et vasculaires dans les processus amnésiques ont échangé lors d'un débat à huit clos sur la composition et le rôle du cerveau. Vidéo : réalisation et montage par Claire Sémavoine et Ugo Savouillan pour Cap Sciences.- published: 24 Oct 2013
- views: 6
66:38
Polyworld: Using Evolution to Design Artificial Intelligence
Google Tech Talks November, 8 2007 ABSTRACT This presentation is about a potential shortcu...
published: 13 Nov 2007
author: GoogleTechTalks
Polyworld: Using Evolution to Design Artificial Intelligence
Polyworld: Using Evolution to Design Artificial Intelligence
Google Tech Talks November, 8 2007 ABSTRACT This presentation is about a potential shortcut to artificial intelligence by trading mind-design for world-desig...- published: 13 Nov 2007
- views: 120060
- author: GoogleTechTalks